“A SECRET GOLDMINE FOR AUSTRALIA!”: Pauline Hanson Unveils Explosive Oil And Gas Plan That Could Reshape The Nation’s Future

Australia’s energy debate has been dramatically reignited after One Nation leader Pauline Hanson unveiled a sweeping new proposal that she says could unlock billions of dollars for the nation while lowering energy costs and strengthening economic security.

The announcement, delivered in Adelaide, immediately sparked fierce discussion among politicians, industry leaders, economists and ordinary Australians concerned about rising living costs and the country’s growing debt burden.

At the heart of Hanson’s proposal is a radical overhaul of how Australia taxes and manages its vast oil and gas resources.

The One Nation leader argues that despite Australia possessing some of the world’s most valuable natural resources, ordinary Australians have seen little benefit from that wealth.

According to Hanson, families are struggling with soaring energy bills, housing pressures and economic uncertainty while enormous profits continue to flow through the resources sector.

She believes the current system is failing taxpayers.

Her solution is both ambitious and controversial.

Under the proposal, One Nation would abolish the Petroleum Resource Rent Tax (PRRT), a long-debated tax applied to offshore petroleum projects.

In its place, Hanson wants to introduce a simpler and more predictable royalty system.

The plan would impose a 10 per cent wellhead royalty on all offshore oil and gas production.

That means companies would pay royalties based on the value of resources at the point they are extracted from the ground.

Hanson argues this would provide more reliable revenue for government while reducing complexity for industry.

But that is only the beginning of her proposal.

One Nation is also calling for a major expansion of oil and gas exploration across Australian waters.

Hanson says Australia needs more energy production, not less.

She argues that increasing domestic supply is essential if the nation wants to secure affordable electricity, support manufacturing and reduce reliance on foreign energy markets.

“We want more gas, more oil, and more energy,” Hanson declared.

The statement quickly became one of the most widely shared moments from her announcement.

Supporters praised the message as common sense.

Critics accused her of ignoring climate concerns.

Yet Hanson insists that energy security must come first.

Perhaps the most striking aspect of the proposal is the creation of an entirely new government-backed investment structure.

Under the plan, the Commonwealth would be allowed to take up to a 30 per cent ownership stake in private oil and gas developments operating in Australian waters.

The government would share costs, risks and profits alongside private companies.

Hanson describes this as a partnership model rather than government control.

She argues that successful countries around the world have already demonstrated the benefits of cooperation between government and industry.

To manage these investments, One Nation wants to establish a new body called the Australian Natural Wealth Investment Corporation, known as ANWIC.

The organisation would oversee the government’s participation in energy projects and direct resources toward strategic national priorities.

These priorities would include fertiliser production, electricity generation, fuel refining and other industries considered critical to Australia’s long-term economic resilience.

Hanson believes this approach would ensure that more of Australia’s natural wealth remains within the country.

Instead of simply exporting resources and watching profits disappear overseas, she says Australians should receive a direct share of the benefits generated from their own resources.

The plan goes even further.

Profits generated through the government’s ownership stakes would be channelled into a sovereign wealth fund.

The model is inspired by Norway’s famous Government Pension Fund Global, widely regarded as one of the most successful sovereign wealth funds in the world.

Hanson argues that future generations should benefit from today’s resource wealth.

Rather than spending all revenue immediately, she wants Australia to build a long-term financial asset capable of supporting the nation for decades.

The proposal arrives amid an increasingly bitter political battle over energy policy.

Several crossbench politicians and advocacy groups have been pushing for a 25 per cent tax on gas exports.

Supporters claim such a tax could raise as much as $17 billion annually.

However, Hanson has launched a fierce attack against the idea.

She warns that a 25 per cent export levy would devastate the gas industry.

According to One Nation, such a tax would discourage investment, reduce production and ultimately damage Australia’s economic competitiveness.

Hanson specifically criticised proposals supported by independent senator David Pocock, environmental groups and various policy institutes.

She accused them of promoting policies that would weaken Australia’s energy sector while pursuing ideological objectives.

“These activists simply want to destroy our gas industry,” Hanson argued.

Her comments immediately intensified an already heated national debate.

The One Nation leader also rejected Labor’s proposal requiring gas producers to reserve a fixed portion of supply for domestic use.

She warned that mandatory reservation schemes could undermine project viability and discourage future investment.

Instead, Hanson argues that her partnership model would naturally increase domestic supply while maintaining incentives for companies to continue exploring and developing new projects.

The timing of the announcement is significant.

Australia is currently facing growing concerns about energy security, future gas shortages and rising power prices.

At the same time, international tensions and ongoing instability in the Middle East have renewed concerns about global fuel markets.

The Coalition has already expressed support for expanded oil and gas exploration.

Labor continues defending its reservation policies.

Crossbench MPs are pushing for tougher taxation measures.

Now Hanson has inserted an entirely different vision into the national conversation.

Supporters say the proposal could generate billions of dollars, strengthen energy independence and create long-term wealth for future generations.

Critics warn that increased fossil fuel development could conflict with climate goals and expose taxpayers to financial risks.

Regardless of where Australians stand on the issue, one thing is undeniable.

Pauline Hanson has once again placed herself at the centre of one of the country’s most important political debates.

And with energy prices, national debt and economic security dominating public concerns, her bold new plan is unlikely to disappear from the headlines anytime soon.