The monarchy is under a vicious, expletive-laden attack! Controversial firebrand Katie Hopkins just released a “blistering” tirade, claiming King Charles has BETRAYED British traditions this Easter

Controversial commentator Katie Hopkins has launched a blistering, expletive-laden tirade against King Charles III, demanding he abdicate and condemning his reported decision not to issue a distinct Easter message.

In a video posted online, Hopkins delivered a furious Easter address directly targeting the monarch, questioning his commitment to Christian traditions and the future of the institution itself.

Hopkins opened with a vulgar personal insult against the King before extending a bizarre invitation to Queen Camilla. She suggested they share a drink, claiming a shared equine resemblance would make them compatible. The rant then quickly pivoted to a core grievance: the King’s approach to his role and the monarchy’s direction.

The focal point of her anger was the perception that King Charles has not separately marked the Christian holiday of Easter, a tradition upheld by the late Queen. “This is a Christian nation,” Hopkins declared, shouting into the camera. “I am king of a Christian country and we will celebrate Easter. [Expletive] it. That’s all you have to do.”

She framed this as a simple failure to follow a proven blueprint. “All he has to do is follow the format that his mother very clearly laid out for him,” she stated, arguing that delivering seasonal messages of unity was not a difficult task.

Hopkins accused Charles of deliberately doing the opposite of what Queen Elizabeth II would have done.

In a startling escalation, Hopkins baselessly speculated, “Charles is a Muslim. Exactly. I’m just saying.” The comment appears tied to the King’s well-documented and longstanding work promoting interfaith dialogue, including his attendance at Ramadan events. She mocked this outreach with a crude impersonation.

Her solution for the monarchy’s perceived woes was unequivocal: removal. “Get rid of the king and Queen Camila,” she demanded, asserting public disinterest in their reign. She called for an immediate transition to the Prince and Princess of Wales, whom she labeled “the fun kids.”

Hopkins proposed a paradoxical revival: a more extravagant, ceremonial, and visually spectacular monarchy led by William and Catherine. She envisioned “big crowns, big cloaky things” and Kate in gold dresses, arguing this would boost tourism and restore a lost epic quality she believes the institution once possessed.

The rant concluded by circling back to her central demand for abdication. “He’s got cancer. I’m probably not going to last much longer,” she said, impersonating the King. “Fuck it. Let’s go balls to the wall.” She urged him to step aside for the next generation.

This outburst from Hopkins, known for inflammatory rhetoric, highlights the intense and often hostile scrutiny facing the modern monarchy.

It underscores the polarized debates about the King’s leadership style, his interfaith efforts, and the institution’s relevance in contemporary Britain.

The Palace has a long-standing policy of not commenting on personal attacks or media criticism. There has been no official indication that the King will alter his planned communications, which typically include acknowledging multiple religious observances during this period.

Constitutional experts note that while the Sovereign is the Supreme Governor of the Church of England, the role has evolved to represent a multi-faith nation. The late Queen also emphasized the importance of all faiths in her later years, a path Charles has deepened.

Hopkins’s video, laden with personal vitriol and controversial claims, is likely to fuel further public debate about the boundaries of commentary on the Head of State and the pressures facing the monarchy as it navigates a new, more informal era under King Charles.